When Tech Isn’t “With and For” Us: How Misaligned Design Reflects Unhealthy Relationships

The notification lights up your screen for the fifth time in an hour. You know you should ignore it — you have work to do, but the pull is irresistible. Sound familiar? Many of us find ourselves caught in a peculiar relationship with our technology, one that increasingly resembles a troubled relationship we can’t quite break free from. The promises are grand: productivity, connection, entertainment, all at our fingertips. Yet somehow, we often feel drained, manipulated, and oddly alone.

This dynamic is about more than just poor user experience or technical shortcomings. It reflects a deeper misalignment between technology’s stated purpose of serving human needs and its actual implementation, which often serves other masters entirely. When we examine these patterns through the lens of relationship dynamics, troubling parallels emerge that can help us understand why some technology leaves us feeling more depleted than empowered.

The Promise of “With and For”: A Foundation Built on Trust

Healthy relationships, whether between people or between humans and their tools, are built on a foundation of mutual benefit and respect. The concept of technology being “with and for” its users echoes the core principles of any nurturing partnership: collaboration, support, and shared growth. When technology truly operates in this mode, it becomes an extension of human capability rather than a constraint upon it.

Consider how your favorite well-designed tool makes you feel — perhaps a carefully crafted note-taking app that seems to anticipate your needs or a communication platform that respects your time and attention. For that matter, think of your most loved watch or favorite kitchen utensil. These technologies don’t demand or impose; they enable and enhance. They’re the digital or technological equivalent of a supportive partner who brings out your best self.

Red Flags in the Digital Domain

Just as we sometimes need outside help to identify patterns of dysfunction in personal relationships, we can spot similar warning signs in our technological interactions. These parallels are more than metaphorical — they reflect fundamental issues of power, control, and respect.

The Silent Treatment and Love Bombing

Social media platforms exemplify this duality. One moment they’re showering you with dopamine-triggering notifications and personalized content — the technological equivalent of love bombing. The next, they’re algorithmically suppressing your posts or arbitrarily changing features you rely on, displaying the same capricious control as a manipulative partner.

Gaslighting at Scale

“You have nothing to worry about if you have nothing to hide.” Sound familiar? This classic gaslighting tactic has become the default response to privacy concerns in the digital age. When platforms dismiss valid user anxieties about data collection and surveillance as paranoid or old-fashioned, they’re engaging in the same reality-distorting behavior that characterizes emotional abuse.

The Cycle of Control

Consider how many apps demand constant attention through notifications, making you feel guilty for not engaging. This mirrors the behavior of controlling friends or partners who require constant check-ins and availability. The design pattern of infinite scroll isn’t just a feature — it’s a mechanism of control that keeps users engaged well past the point of diminishing returns, much like a partner who doesn’t respect your need for space or independent interests.

Selective Hearing

When platforms consistently ignore user feedback about features that harm the user experience but benefit their business model, they’re exhibiting the same selective deafness as a partner who listens only when it serves their interests. The persistent reintroduction of unwanted features or the slow creep of privacy-invading settings mirrors the way boundary violations in relationships often start small and escalate over time.

The Societal Cost of Toxic Tech Relationships

The impact of these dysfunctional dynamics extends far beyond individual user experiences. Just as troubled relationships can affect entire social networks, misaligned technology shapes society in profound ways. We see this in the erosion of privacy expectations, the normalization of attention manipulation, and the growing sense of technological learned helplessness among users.

Consider how app designers explicitly engineer their platforms around variable reward schedules — the same psychological principle that makes gambling so addictive. These aren’t accidental features but carefully crafted mechanisms aimed at maximizing engagement metrics. Social media platforms, for instance, don’t simply connect us; they reshape our fundamental behaviors around communication, attention, and social validation. The endless scroll, strategic notification timing, and algorithmic content curation aren’t neutral tools — they’re architectural choices that prioritize platform engagement over user wellbeing.

The mental load of managing these digital relationships manifests in increasingly visible ways. Modern workers toggle between apps and communications channels dozens of times per hour, each context switch fragmenting attention and increasing cognitive load. This constant task-switching and attention manipulation creates a state of continuous partial attention — we’re theoretically more connected than ever, yet increasingly unable to engage deeply with any single task or relationship.

This technological dependency has become so normalized that we often fail to recognize its broader implications. Like a person gradually adapting to an unhealthy relationship, society has slowly adjusted to these attention-extractive systems, treating as normal what should be seen as deeply problematic patterns of technological control.

Reimagining the Relationship

What would technology truly designed to be “with and for” its users look like? It would start by acknowledging and respecting user agency. Like a healthy relationship partner, it would:

• Communicate clearly about its intentions and capabilities
• Respect boundaries and privacy preferences
• Support user goals without imposing its own agenda
• Adapt and grow based on genuine feedback
• Prioritize long-term user well-being over short-term engagement metrics

Breaking Free from Toxic Tech

Recognition is the first step toward change. Just as understanding toxic relationship patterns helps people make better personal choices, understanding these technological dynamics empowers users to demand better from their digital tools. We deserve technology that enhances rather than diminishes our humanity, that serves rather than subjugates.

The solution isn’t just digital abstinence — it’s developing healthier relationships with technology. This means seeking out tools designed with genuine respect for user autonomy, supporting developers and companies that demonstrate an authentic commitment to user wellbeing, and being willing to end relationships with technologies that consistently violate our trust or boundaries.

As we continue to integrate technology more deeply into our lives, the quality of these relationships becomes increasingly crucial to our individual and collective well-being. The future of human-technology interaction doesn’t have to mirror the worst aspects of human relationships. By recognizing these patterns and demanding better, we can work toward technology that truly operates “with and for” its users, creating digital experiences that enhance rather than exploit our humanity.